Orient Kamasu Review

The Orient Kamasu is the Mako's sapphire-glass sibling: the same in-house F6922 automatic, the same true 200 metres, but with far more scratch-resistant glass and usually better lume. If you will wear it daily and knock it about, the small premium is the most sensible upgrade going. If mineral is enough, the Mako 3 still holds.
Key takeaways
- The Kamasu is the Mako's sapphire-glass sibling: same F6922 calibre, same true 200 metres, but far more scratch-resistant glass.
- Sapphire is much harder than mineral; it stays clear for years, while mineral gathers hairline scratches over time.
- The in-house F6922 automatic both hand-winds and hacks, a pairing that is rare at this price.
- It usually arrives with slightly better lume than the Mako, so night-time legibility is a touch easier.
- If you will wear it daily and hard, the small premium is the most sensible upgrade; if only seldom, the Mako 3 is enough.
What the Kamasu is and what sets it apart
The Orient Kamasu is the sapphire-glass member of the Mako family. In a sentence: it carries the same in-house automatic calibre and the same true 200 metres as the Mako 3, but it brings one important upgrade on the glass. When you are shopping for a dive watch, that is the detail most people overlook: even when the calibre and the depth rating are identical on paper, the crystal is the part that lives a daily life. Who is it for? Anyone after a first proper automatic who intends to use the watch like a genuine tool, not a museum piece.
The sapphire glass, the real upgrade over the Mako
The Mako 3 uses a mineral crystal; the Kamasu gives you a sapphire crystal. What does that mean in practice? Sapphire is much harder than mineral and far more scratch-resistant; it shrugs off the steel keyring, the doorframe and the desk edge that would mark mineral over time. A mineral crystal gathers hairline scratches; sapphire stays clear for years. The one nuance is that under a very hard knock sapphire can be a touch more prone to cracking than mineral, but for everyday wear sapphire wins clearly. The Kamasu also usually arrives with slightly better lume than the Mako, so night-time legibility is a little easier.
The Orient Kamasu is the subject of this review; it comes in several dial and bracelet options on the same roughly 41.8mm case, so the choice is about colour, not size.
The movement inside, Orient's F6922
The heart is the same as the Mako: the F6922, Orient's own automatic calibre. 22 jewels, 21,600 beats per hour, around 40 hours of power reserve. Two features matter. You can hand-wind it (turn the crown to start a stopped watch), and it hacks (pull the crown and the seconds hand stops, so you can set it to the second). That pairing is far from universal on every automatic watch in this price band. Keep your accuracy expectations realistic: a few seconds of drift a day is normal, this is no chronometer, and if you wear it regularly and rest it in a consistent position you can rein the drift in yourself.
On the wrist and in everyday use
The case is about 41.8mm, with a screw-down crown and a unidirectional rotating bezel. The steel bracelet has none of the hollow rattle of cheaper watches and sits properly on the wrist. The bezel turns with crisp clicks and inspires confidence when timing a dive. A true 200 metres comfortably covers swimming and snorkelling, and it is rated well beyond recreational scuba depths, provided the crown is screwed fully home before the watch goes near water. This is where the sapphire really pays off: if you genuinely use the watch, the glass stays as clear years later as it was on day one.
The specs at a glance
| Specification | Kamasu |
|---|---|
| Calibre | Orient F6922, automatic |
| Glass | Sapphire |
| Water resistance | 200m, screw-down crown |
| Case | ~41.8mm |
Kamasu or Mako
This is the most common dilemma. Both run the same F6922 calibre and the same true 200 metres. The difference is almost entirely the glass. If you intend to wear it daily and give it a hard life, the small premium for the Kamasu's sapphire over the Mako 3 is among the most sensible money you can spend over the long run. If you will wear it seldom, and with care, the Mako 3 is more than enough and saves you a little. For the wider picture, see my Orient Mako 3 review, the best dive watches under $500 guide, and the roundup of the best Japanese watches.
Specifications
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Calibre | Orient F6922, automatic |
| Glass | Sapphire |
| Water resistance | 200m, screw-down crown |
| Case | ~41.8mm |
Pros
- Far more scratch-resistant sapphire glass that stays clear for years
- Its own automatic calibre (F6922) at this price, with hand-winding and hacking
- A full-fledged diver with a true 200 metres, a screw-down crown and a unidirectional bezel
- Usually slightly better lume than the Mako
Cons
- It carries a small premium over the Mako 3
- Sapphire can be a touch more prone to cracking than mineral under a very hard knock
- The lume is strong and competitive with Seiko, though Seiko's high-end Lumibrite divers can still edge it
- At ~41.8mm with real diver heft, it can wear large on a slim wrist
Verdict
If you will actually use the watch, wearing it daily and knocking it about, my pick is clear: the Orient Kamasu. Because it carries the same calibre and the same true 200 metres and adds sapphire glass that stays clear for years, the small premium is the most sensible upgrade over the long run. If you will wear it seldom and with care, you lose nothing by choosing the Mako 3.
Watches we recommend
Frequently asked questions
Is the Orient Kamasu worth buying?
Yes. At this price it is one of very few divers that combine an in-house automatic calibre, a true 200 metres and a scratch-resistant sapphire crystal. It is one of the most sensible picks if you will wear it daily and hard; if you will wear it seldom, the mineral-glass Mako 3 is also enough.
Should I buy the Orient Kamasu or the Mako 3?
Both carry the same F6922 calibre and the same true 200 metres. The difference is almost entirely the glass: the Kamasu gives you scratch-resistant sapphire and usually better lume, while the Mako 3 uses mineral glass. If you will wear it hard daily, choose the Kamasu; if you will wear it seldom and with care, the Mako 3 is enough.
Is the Kamasu's sapphire glass really better than mineral?
For scratches, yes, clearly. Sapphire is much harder than mineral and stays clear for years, while mineral gathers hairline scratches over time. The one nuance is that it can be a touch more prone to cracking under a very hard knock, but for everyday wear sapphire wins clearly.

About the author
Serdar D.Watch Editor
View profileSerdar D. is the editor at BraveryWatch. He believes a good watch should be not just expensive but right. He gets deep into the details, then turns them into something that is genuinely a pleasure to read. He gives relaxed, useful advice through the eyes of someone who truly cares about watches.

